7 PSI on a T88 is already a lot of air & power. There was nothing wrong with timing, we were running very conservative and also there was no sign of detonation at all (nothing on the pistons).The rod fails at 7 psi means there gotta be a serious problem with timing or something else, even though the rod is skinny.
If your boost gauge is measured in the intake manifold, then 7 psi on a T3 or T88 is pretty much the same because that's how much pressurized air there is. If your timing is so advanced, that'll kill the rods while the rods are moving up.7 PSI on a T88 is already a lot of air & power. There was nothing wrong with timing, we were running very conservative and also there was no sign of detonation at all (nothing on the pistons).
Also timing doesn't kill rods. How can it?
Justen,
You're a detail oriented man. 7 psi is still 7 psi (pound per square inch and it's a unit of pressure), and you're correct that there're other factors involving to make more power.
You are now taking another factor in it due to heat. Heat expands and creates more pressure. If you're talking about air volumn and its density, then it's not measured by psi. I didn't score really good in my physics class, but you keep calling for it. That's why I majored in Management of Information System. A physics drop-out as you can say. Here are some good readings about physics on density: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density
You are now taking another factor in it due to heat. Heat expands and creates more pressure. If you're talking about air volumn and its density, then it's not measured by psi. I didn't score really good in my physics class, but you keep calling for it. That's why I majored in Management of Information System. A physics drop-out as you can say. Here are some good readings about physics on density: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density
So this is rubbishThe rod fails at 7 psi means there gotta be a serious problem with timing or something else, even though the rod is skinny.
How much power would you say is the limit for the skinny rodded motor? 330rear wheel horsepower or the like?So this is rubbish
If I have an efficient intercooler on a smaller turbo, I can still have the cool air that makes up for the small size. If the temps from both small and big systems are the same with the same psi, then that'll be equal. I never denied the factor of air density when I initially started the post, but I just brought up the first issue that comes to mind.
The skinny rods are very very skinny and on top of that the material casting is really weak. It's some weird powder pressure rod or something. It breaks so freaking early, I would throw them away even when you have charge air. Any boost will break them!How much power would you say is the limit for the skinny rodded motor? 330rear wheel horsepower or the like?
You just have to make me work so hard, don't you?No arguments on that score
Wow, thanks for that news. I will have to run a huge blower pulley and go very easy on my motor then. Maybe I'll stop at 330 crank horsepower (vs. 260 stock)The skinny rods are very very skinny and on top of that the material casting is really weak. It's some weird powder pressure rod or something. It breaks so freaking early, I would throw them away even when you have charge air. Any boost will break them!
The skinny rods are very very skinny and on top of that the material casting is really weak. It's some weird powder pressure rod or something. It breaks so freaking early, I would throw them away even when you have charge air. Any boost will break them!